I'm a Dedicated Capitalist, Yet Universal Medicare Represents the Best Hope for US Health System

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Selecting the right medical coverage for companies – or for households – seems like demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It Is Costly

Based on a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes regarding subsidies which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals get paid changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages pays about five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you compare that with what average US resident spends. I can name multiple businesses who are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like many federal military, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. And there would definitely exist less liability for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that government play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a better and less expensive approach for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, according to major studies. Maybe one positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we take serious examination at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.

Cynthia Barber
Cynthia Barber

A seasoned gaming analyst with over a decade of experience in online casinos, specializing in slot mechanics and player psychology.